i know at this point it is so daybeforeyesterday's news but i feel
compelled to write about the oscars. we all know that at one point in
my nakedjen lifetime i lived and died by the manolos and versaces. the
oscar's red carpet makes me practically hyperventilate in anticipation
of what might just appear.
i have one primary thing to say about this year's overall fashion
statement. mermaids do far better swimming in the sea than they do
walking on the planet.
i was not at all impressed by the mermaid gowns. not at all. this is
primarily because those who chose to wear them would have looked FAR
BETTER if they had chosen a different style of dress. a mermaid gown is
not flattering to those of us who have broad hips. and honey, that's
most of us. really and truly. we are women. we are meant to create
life. we have broad hips. very few of us can pull off a gown that is
hugging our hips like a girdle only to then accentuate their broadness
with a flippy skirt near our feet. just doesn't work.
there's been a lot of talk about hilary swank's dress. oprah nearly
went into cardiac arrest gushing over it. and we all know if oprah says
it's fabulous, well we're going to have ten million women all around
the world rushing to buy one just like it. i hope that in this case
they don't. we all must remember that hilary swank had a team of
professional trainers working with her seven days a week to have a back
that beautiful. a back that had not an ounce of fat and beautiful lats
and was just lovely to look at. the rest of us, oprah included, do not
have backs like that. and our backs aren't going to look quite that
good in that dress. let's also remember that we don't have the "magic"
underwear that hollywood has. just like they have magic potions for
their hair, they also have magic undergarments. some day one of us is
going to crack that code and make millions of dollars sharing those
magic undergarments with the rest of the world. but right now? we're
stuck with our panties from victoria's secret. and those are not going
to cut it under that dress.
the thing about that dress? it was lovely if hilary had been walking
into the oscars BACKWARDS. but we don't walk into the oscars backwards,
now, do we? no, we walk into the oscars and up to the stage facing
forward. and hilary admitted that she chose it because it had LONG
SLEEVES and she was worried that it was going to be a cold and chilly
night and she wanted to be warm and comfortable. from the front she
looked like she was certainly warm and comfortable and all wrapped up
mummy style. a bobble head doll over a sea of navy blue fabric. like i
said, if she spent the night walking around backwards, it was quite
dramatic. but from the front? eh. not so much.
i wasn't quite so enamoured with all the yellow this year. and versace
actually got far too much exposure. messy versace, too. poor virginia
madsen. she was so proud to tell everyone that her mermaid dress had
been made especially for her. the only problem was that when versace
actually caught that chicken of the sea girl in their fishing net they
forgot to remove the net before dumping virginia into the dress. she
was a shipwreck.
i knew that the big bow on penelope cruz's posterior
was going to create some problems. i even hoped that mr. de la renta
had been kind and had velcroed it in place so she could pop it off and
place it in her lap while sitting in her seat. the bow could double as
her handbag for the evening! but sadly, this was not the case, and by
the time she actually appeared on stage to present the bow had twisted
itself into a mangled mess and just created a huge butt distraction.
not lovely. not good at all.
another problem we had this year were the squished boobs. women you
have breasts. some larger than others. please stop squishing them. it's
not a good look. choose a dress that fits! there's an idea. and then if
you're sad because it's not quite showing off your pilates thin waist
the way you want, well, have it tailored. your stylists are paid a LOT
of money. tell your stylist to stop squishing your boobs. especially your breast-feeding ones!
it was beyonce's oscars and the rest of the folks were just there to
act as extras. but beyonce, honey, you goofed when you attempted to
actually wear the chandelier from phantom of the opera. there are times
when there is too much bling. i needed my sunglasses for that number.
and why you sang it instead of emma is still rather confusing to me.
she was there in her own little red mermaid frock. why didn't she sing?
maybe she didn't want to wear the chandelier?
melanie? a word of advice. don't let antonio go shopping in las vegas show girls' second hand shops for your oscar gown, sweetie. you're not looking quite so fab these days and well, that dress? not so good. not so good at all. but you told everyone who would listen that HE chose it because it was sexy and you were not going to tell him no. next time? tell him no. please.
kate winslet, who already has my vote because she married sam mendes,
knows how to dress. she understands her body. she knows that she needs
to avoid those mermaid dresses. a bias cut dress makes her look
fabulous. and the one she chose from badgley mischka was so perfect for
her. and so fashion forward. blue is this year's black. she looked like
a breath of fresh air.
can someone please explain to me what was up with the ankhs? did you
all notice johnny depp (who i will forgive for his outfit because he
is, johnny depp, and well i expect him to look different) was sporting
one in the center of his neck. and other men were sporting them as
well? like an ankh has replaced a red ribbon or pink ribbon or whatever
the ribbon of the day is. are ankhs some new political fashion
statement that the hollywood establishment forgot to send me a memo
about?
i will give props to chris rock. for a first time host, he managed to
diss just about everyone in the audience in some form or another. i
liked his opening monologue imploring hollywood studios to please wait
for an actual "star" before making a movie. and how can i not love him
for comparing george w's re-election to having a job review at the gap
when you've somehow lost $80 trillion dollars in the cash register and
have waged war on banana republic? loved that.
i was not happy, though, with the decision to a) put all the nominees
on stage or b) give them award in their "section" of the audience. i
know that the producers did this to save time, but it only really
served to discount those oscars even more. hey, you're up for best
short film. but guess what? we don't care. so we're going to have laura
linney fashion victim (oh good god, laura, if you had a fashion stylist
helping you please FIRE that person rightthisveryminute and i'm
guessing you traveled in a time machine back to the 80's for your do?)
stand here in the aisle next to your seat where we have all of you
crammed together and give you your award right here. right here in the
BACK ROW, because we can not be bothered to let you have your few
minutes of oscar glory and allow you to walk up to the stage and
receive your award like the IMPORTANT people. no. you want to go on
stage? well then make a "REAL" movie for god's sake.
but poor martin scorsese made a real movie. and even he didn't get to
go up on stage. as much as i thought million dollar baby was a good
movie, i think martin scorsese was robbed this year. aviator was a
CLASSIC film. it had all the pieces that a BEST PICTURE should have as
well. but i'm not a voting member of the academy. so i don't get to
choose. but i felt sorry that he didn't win.
my most thrilling moment? charlie kaufman actually WINNING the award
for best original screenplay. it's no secret around here that i think
he's just brilliant, but i was almost certain that he'd lose out to the
aviator just because it seemed like an aviator kind of year. eternal
sunshine is quirky. it is brilliant writing, but so not mainstream. but
charlie always surprises us, he always is brilliant and i'm so glad
that he won. and he certainly seemed just as shocked as the rest of us
that he won.

in a hollywood world where mr. kaufman can win for best original screenplay, i still have hope that one day i might be on the arm of my own oscar contender. yes hope. because i'm married to one rather quirky and talented screenwriter myself. and i have big hopes that one day he'll be on stage and forget to thank his wife. of course, he also knows should i ever get on stage to accept an oscar (what for, you ask? god knows. maybe just for being nakedjen) i will thank clyde. and probably forget to thank anyone else. well, i'm sure i'll mention the universe. and that pretty much covers my broad hips, right? even if they're sporting a mermaid skirt.
p.s. cinderella? the pumpkin coach somehow didn't make it. but your fairy godmother is looking for you.
someone needs to let that woman know that ORANGE is not her most flattering color. jeez!